Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Deontological vs . Teleological Ethical SystemsIn our e rattlingday life , we argon infinitely faced by many dilemmas . Most of them be precise difficult to solve or even understand . The hick foundation of stimulateting by means of these problems is by considering honourable philosophy . The 2 come alonges use in this concept are the deontological and the teleological climax . The main difference between the two is where the profundity , whether this is cracking or icky , should be made . In the deontological come on , the judgment lies in the beginning or at the beat of doing . That is , if you re now doing your duty or doing what is best , consequently you are doing honourable exercises whether in the end it may seduce pretty results or lead have unhealthful do to something . On the otherwise hand the t eleological cuddle emphasizes the consequences of what wiz is doing , that is , the judgment of morality lies at the end or afterwards the put through is done . Thus , whether the follow through seems noisome for someone plainly if it exit have receiptss or will result to good , then that go through is honorable For exemplification , lying to masking piece someone or that will result to goodness is bad through the deontological approach since it violates the duty of being honest , that it is good in teleological because it helps to the goodness of someoneLike what is stated , the alkali of making decisions in all dilemma is the ethics . The tempered of instruction or principles used in ethics is stored or compiled in a cloth called ethical frames . There are seven known ethical systems namely , the ethical hypocrisy utilitarianism , religion , natural virtue , ethics of virtue , ethics of care and the egoismThe ethical dissimulation is a good example to show the deontological approach in applying ethics . ! In this system , the basis of judgment is and on the motive of doing the action mechanism .

If the motive is good whether it pipe down results to something bad , then the action is good . Similarly if on that point is an ulterior motive in doing the action whether it will benefit others , then the action will be considered bad . The basis of asseverateing good or bad lies in habitual concepts that states that what is good must be good for e actuallyone . For example , if your whiz asks you to help her in her assignment and you said yes to her , then your action can either be considered good or bad accordi ng to the motive . If you re real in helping her , or you re not expecting any reenforcement for doing so , then your action is good . Your action is bad is you re expecting a reward , say a free dinnerOn the other hand , a very good example in seeing the teleological approach is the utilitarianism . Here , the action is judged on the benefits or the utilities derived from doing the action . If it will benefit many or will have larger benefits even if it is not reproducible with our duties , then the action is moral . That is , it is ok to...If you want to get a full essay, range it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper