Business Law- Case Brief

[Name][Professor][Subject][Date]Watson v . Johnson Mobile Homes , 284 F .3d 568 (5th Circuit , 02 /27 /2002Facts : Watson d an coat for the purchase of supple home from the defendants . The purchase plow for a creed drill and a deposit of 4 ,000 . It was agreed that if the company refused Watson s practical application the deposit will be refunded alone if the application was pass Watson s deposit will be forfeited should she decide not to continue with the purchase . When Watson s application was denied , the salesman informed Watson if she was willing to devote another 3 ,000 as a requirement in view of their poor ascribe history . The Watsons refused and decided to catch their money back . The Watsons family onset to recover their money but it was not call ined to them . Thus , the Watsons d a suit .

The gore found the defendants liable for allow out of contract , histrion and conversion and awarded the Watsons 4 ,000 in unquestionable restitution and 700 ,000 in relatiative restorationIssue : 1 ) Is the Watsons were authorize to punitive damages2 ) Is the punitive damages award of 700 ,000 constitutionally excessiveHolding : 1 . Yes because the defendants acted with malevolence in refusing to return the deposit paid by the Watsons2 . No . The punitive damages award in the total of 700 ,000 was constitutionally excessiveRationale : The US apostrophize of Appeals said that there ar two tests in ascertain whether punitive damages should be awarded : 1 ) the defendant commit an independent...If you want to get a lavish essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper